Comparison
The honest comparison.
SafeBase, Vanta and Drata are good products. They are also US platforms, which is the one thing a company answering to the RBI cannot change about them.
| Capability | TrustShot | SafeBase | Vanta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data stored in India | |||
| Priced for the Indian market | |||
| RBI / SEBI / CERT-In frameworks built in | |||
| DPO and Grievance Officer fields | |||
| Public Trust Center page | |||
| Gated documents with NDA | |||
| Watermarked, non-downloadable viewer | Limited | ||
| Your own subdomain with free HTTPS | |||
| Works alongside your existing GRC tool | Bundled | ||
| Full GRC / evidence automation | Separate product |
Comparison reflects publicly documented positioning at the time of writing and is limited to structural differences — where a product is hosted and what it is built for — rather than contested feature claims. Vendors change their offerings; verify anything decision-critical with them directly.
When TrustShot is the better fit
You sell to Indian banks, NBFCs, insurers or payment companies. Your buyers ask where data is stored before they ask what the product does. You want a Trust Center without replacing the GRC tooling you already run.
When it is not
You want continuous automated evidence collection wired into AWS, Okta and your HR system. That is what Vanta and Drata are built for, and we do not pretend otherwise — TrustShot is the outward-facing half.